99Science · AI & science

SCIENCE UNDER AUTOMATION

AI in Radiology: capabilities and evidence

6.4 vs 5.0 cancers detected per 1,000 screened

What has AI demonstrated?

6.4 vs 5.0 cancers detected per 1,000 screened

Test
Randomized AI-supported mammography reading; reported 29% detection increase and 44% less reading workload.
Comparison
Standard double reading without AI; the intervention still includes radiologists.
System and version
MASAI · 2025
Evidence checked
2026-10-21

This is evidence for assisted screening. It does not measure autonomous diagnosis, other imaging modalities or independent patient management.

What does the field require?

Read a mammography screening examination

Resolve an unfamiliar diagnostic problem

Research tasks

Read a mammography screening examination

This is evidence for assisted screening. It does not measure autonomous diagnosis, other imaging modalities or independent patient management.

Resolve an unfamiliar diagnostic problem

This broader workflow has not been evaluated by the cited demonstration.

Can AI replace the whole workflow?

The results above measure specific tasks. The field assessment also requires completion of the connected workflow, including the requirements listed here. A field-wide replacement percentage has not been established.

Read the assessment method

Sources and related evidence

Compare related fields

Computational genomics · Theoretical physics · Experimental molecular biology