Analyse an existing ecological dataset
Relevant agent benchmarks still need to be reviewed and mapped.
SCIENCE UNDER AUTOMATION
Collecting observations can require access to a changing landscape. Models may accelerate analysis while sampling, local context and the time needed to observe change remain limiting.
60.8% ± 0.8% capability reported
Production-style API for three environmental indicators in Spain and Portugal; does not test field sampling or ecological causal inference. Reported ± is not relabeled as a confidence interval.
GeoNatureAgent evaluates supplied queries and geospatial tools.
GeoNatureAgent v2Performance is partial across 93 tasks in two countries.
GeoNatureAgent v2API success does not establish causal or sampling validity.
GeoNatureAgent v2Geospatial API tasks do not test field sampling design.
GeoNatureAgent v2Physical fieldwork is not evaluated.
GeoNatureAgent v2Independent causal ecological inference is not evaluated.
GeoNatureAgent v2Relevant agent benchmarks still need to be reviewed and mapped.
Remote sensing or robotics may change particular workflows; they need their own evidence.
Fast computation does not shorten the underlying biological process.
The results above measure specific tasks. The field assessment also requires completion of the connected workflow, including the requirements listed here. A field-wide replacement percentage has not been established.
Read the assessment method